Breakdown - Sharks of the Corn

Wiki Article

Are you up for an adrenaline-pumping ride through shark-infested cornfields? Don't hesitate to get yourself on the ride, because "Sharks of the Corn" promises sensational horror as well as comedy. Created by the famous Tim Ritter, this ultra low-budget flick draws on Stephen King's famous "Children of the Corn" (1984) and turns it into a hilarious, bizarre humorous spoof that'll leave to scratch your head in disbelief and squatting on the ground with laughter.

An Cornfield Carnival of Chaos

From the opening scene in one of the fields that seems innocent "Sharks of the Corn" shows its quirky side. We meet Gary and Susan in the film, two characters who gradually fade out of the picture and the movie veers into different ways. The story weaves together horror components with lots of subplots. This creates a wonderful combo that's best described as a cornfield-style carnival full of craziness.

A Humanistic Shark Enthusiasm

Enter Teddy Bo Lucas, a character who brings an additional edge to an amazing storyline. This crazy shark enthusiast has an uncanny fascination with these sharks that live in the ocean. Like if the idea of sharks living in fields were not enough of a bizarre sight, Teddy takes his obsession to an entire new level after his shocking act of murder occurs in the motel room. The shocking twist set the stage to a frenzy of intrigue and mystery.

Confusion, Cults in addition to Sharks

The story gets more complicated as authorities ascribe the blame to the poor Gary for the murder of Susan, yet despite the lack of motive. A shark cult develops into a unique subplot. The story takes us to the world of cornfields where admiration for sharks meet. Then, just as you think things could not get much worse an inept couple of burglars take on the task to steal a shark pup from the community. It's an unsettling mix of comic and slapstick that will keep the audience on their toes.

Critiques as well as Comic Relief

Although "Sharks of the Corn" has a refreshing and distinctive entertainment, it's certainly not without any flaws. It frequently switches between the various scenes and characters, rendering some viewers disorientated and having trouble navigating the diverse plotlines. It's a conscious choice of (blog) stylistic design in the film that adds to its spoof style of the film however, it might not be everyone's cup.

The production value of the film are deliberately low and the acting falls into the realm of questionable. In spite of the plethora of weak performances, Steve Guynn shines through with the laudable character he portrays, embodying his character instead of merely reciting lines. It's a rare gem of genuine acting in a sea of exaggerated performances.

Shark Puppets and Bonkers Plotlines

"Sharks of the Corn" showcases its low-budget appeal with simple effects with a certain charm. It is notable that the majority of shark attack scenes have a hilarious re-creation using hand puppets. They add a touch of absurdity to the movie. The absurd plot, that revolves in a shark cult's plans to revive a python goddess which is when the film really unleashes its imagination. The problem is that this creative thinking often will not result in an interesting enjoyment.

Amateurish Cinematography, Explosions Optional

Another area where "Sharks of the Corn" doesn't quite measure up is the cinematography. The framing and visuals come appear amateurish and lack quality and refinement that's typically seen typical of mainstream horror films. While this is likely in keeping the look of low-budget films However, it impacts the quality of the overall experience.

In the final analysis "Sharks of (blog) the Corn" can be described as a taste that is not for everyone. It's boring and slow mix of characters that could take a while to grasp the meaning of. Film's low production standards in addition to the confusing plotlines and problematic acting will turn off individuals seeking a more sophisticated horror-comedy. If you're looking for uninspiring films for entertainment "Sharks of the Corn" has a hard time delivering the anticipated hilarity.

Final Rating 1 "Stock Footage Overlay" Out Five

Its low-quality footage, audio, acting, and editing skills "Sharks of the Corn" isn't up to the level. In spite of the possibility for a humorous spoof movie, it ultimately fails to deliver an immersive and satisfying entertainment. Since I am the reviewer, let me leave you with a lighthearted observation: movies, similar to corn, become more enjoyable in the event that you throw explosions. However, "Sharks of the Corn" will not make the grade.

Report this wiki page